Heart Rate Vs Perceived Exertion in Cyclists

In cycling there are several ways to gauge how hardwith heart rate.
you are working. The first and most common methodLevel Effort
is heart rate monitoring. The second, less common but1 Very Light
just as effective, is perceived exertion. There is also a2 Light
third called power monitoring but most cyclists do not3 Moderate
have access to this kind of sophisticated equipment.4 Hard
What many cyclists don't know is that heart rate isn't5 Very Hard
as accurate a gauge as many people would like to6 Maximal
think. In this post we will discuss why this is so as wellA common way to judge perceived exertion is by
as why perceived exertion, in many instances, cancreating a chart using the numbers of perceived
actually prove to be a more accurate gauge.exertion. Each time you workout you want to give the
Heart rate monitoring tells you just that, how fast yoursession a number coinciding with an exertion level from
heart is pumping. If you take a sedentary person off ofthe chart. It takes a few weeks of various exercises
the couch, put them on a bike and tell them to go at ato get the feel of each level, but once you get a
decent clip for five minutes, by the end their heart rategeneral idea the chart will become an invaluable training
will have raised drastically, even though they may nottool.
be working that hard. On the other hand you can takeFor example, when you write up your weekly training
a very fit athlete and have him pedal at 120 RPMs forschedule instead of putting just 1 hour Tuesday, 5
five minutes at a decent resistance and his heart ratehours Wednesday etc. you can put 1 hours Tuesday
only increase slightly, even though he is putting forth aat level 4, 5 hours Wednesday at level 3. This method
great effort. To overcome this discrepancy many eliteis a lot easier than monitoring heart rate but just as
cyclists prefer to use perceived exertion in conjunctioneffective in training.